Medford, Oregon Unemployment
The BLS reported that the unemployment rate for Medford fell 0.0 percentage points in November 2023 to 4.1%. For the same month, the metro unemployment rate was 0.5 percentage points higher than the Oregon rate. The unemployment rate in Medford peaked in April 2020 at 14.2% and is now 10.1 percentage points lower. From a post peak low of 4.1% in February 2022, the unemployment rate has now grown by 0.0 percentage points. You can also compare Medford unemployment with unemployment in other cities.
Unemployment Rate | November 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
National | 3.7% | -0.1 | +0.1 |
Oregon | 3.6% | 0.0 | -1.2 |
Medford | 4.1% | 0.0 | -1.2 |
Unemployment Rate: Medford, Oregon, National
Note: Recessions shown in gray.
Medford, Oregon Unemployed
The number of people unemployed in Medford peaked in April 2020 at 14,355. There are now 10,090 fewer people unemployed in the metropolitan area. Medford employment and jobs data (including jobs lost/gained in Medford, Oregon) is also available.
Unemployed Persons | November 2023 | Month/Month | Year/Year |
---|---|---|---|
Medford | 4,265 | -4 | -1,438 |
Number of Unemployed Persons
Medford, Oregon Unemployment History
Date | National Unemployment Rate |
Oregon Unemployment Rate |
Medford Unemployment Rate |
Medford Unemployed |
---|---|---|---|---|
December 2023 |
3.7% | — | — | — |
November 2023 |
3.7% | 3.6% | 4.1% | 4,265 |
October 2023 |
3.8% | 3.6% | 4.1% | 4,269 |
September 2023 |
3.8% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 4,301 |
August 2023 |
3.8% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 4,352 |
July 2023 |
3.5% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4,515 |
June 2023 |
3.6% | 3.5% | 4.4% | 4,623 |
May 2023 |
3.7% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 4,899 |
April 2023 |
3.4% | 4.0% | 4.8% | 5,141 |
March 2023 |
3.5% | 4.4% | 5.2% | 5,530 |
February 2023 |
3.6% | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5,810 |
January 2023 |
3.4% | 4.8% | 5.4% | 5,787 |
1. Metro area unemployment rates are now seasonally adjusted. The BLS has started publishing smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area data which makes comparisons to state and national data more relevant than the unadjusted numbers. ↩